<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways Social Media Reminds Me of 1995</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/</link>
	<description>Marketing Communications in the Age of New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:18:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-536</guid>
		<description>1995 was around the time the website for my business was created. I remember back then that the mentality was &quot;Put up a website, thousands of people will come visit it and you&#039;ll get lots of orders&quot; 

Today I see many companies jumping on the Social Media band wagon as a strategy to get &quot;Buzz&quot; and as a P.R. panacea.

Then &amp; Now: Social Media (Internet) should be the hammer in your company&#039;s toolbox; never a stand-alone strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1995 was around the time the website for my business was created. I remember back then that the mentality was &#8220;Put up a website, thousands of people will come visit it and you&#8217;ll get lots of orders&#8221; </p>
<p>Today I see many companies jumping on the Social Media band wagon as a strategy to get &#8220;Buzz&#8221; and as a P.R. panacea.</p>
<p>Then &amp; Now: Social Media (Internet) should be the hammer in your company&#8217;s toolbox; never a stand-alone strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Moneysmith</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Moneysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-534</guid>
		<description>John: Thanks for the note. I think one of the few perks of getting older is perspective.  If I line up a trend line from where things were in 1995 thru today, I at least have a hint where things are going tomorrow. G$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: Thanks for the note. I think one of the few perks of getting older is perspective.  If I line up a trend line from where things were in 1995 thru today, I at least have a hint where things are going tomorrow. G$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Katila</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>John Katila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-533</guid>
		<description>As one of the old-timers, I see a lot of similarities between then and now as some folks struggle with changes that threaten to throw their paradigm out of whack. For some, social media has been a logical next step in the progression of technology. Others (even some technology veterans) seem to struggle to connect the dots. If a behavior is something they don&#039;t care to do personally (Facebook, Twitter, etc), they tend to dismiss it and underestimate the significance of the behavioral shift. It&#039;s fascinating (and a little scary) to think about how my kids will be using technology on a daily basis 10 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the old-timers, I see a lot of similarities between then and now as some folks struggle with changes that threaten to throw their paradigm out of whack. For some, social media has been a logical next step in the progression of technology. Others (even some technology veterans) seem to struggle to connect the dots. If a behavior is something they don&#8217;t care to do personally (Facebook, Twitter, etc), they tend to dismiss it and underestimate the significance of the behavioral shift. It&#8217;s fascinating (and a little scary) to think about how my kids will be using technology on a daily basis 10 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-532</guid>
		<description>You made me feel very old. I was one of those kids in the 90s who thought I knew everything and loved to play with all the new toys. I love twitter, and can&#039;t imagine what will come next. I guess what your post is saying is embrace change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made me feel very old. I was one of those kids in the 90s who thought I knew everything and loved to play with all the new toys. I love twitter, and can&#8217;t imagine what will come next. I guess what your post is saying is embrace change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Moneysmith</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Moneysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Mike: Ah, yes...I agree.  We take for granted that these &quot;free&quot; social media sites are utilities.  YouTube loses $1.5 million/day which Google says is inconsequential, but *still* -- that&#039;s a lot of cabbage.  Facebook is notorious for saying they&#039;re not focused on monetization yet.  So who knows about their long term viability.  THAT SAID, I do believe that engaging in social media is more of a cultural change in organizations vs. learning a particular tool.  So while Twitter may some day go bye-bye (be still my heart), the idea of online networking for customer service, market research, PR, etc. will persist.  It&#039;ll just be via the newest tool in the toybox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Ah, yes&#8230;I agree.  We take for granted that these &#8220;free&#8221; social media sites are utilities.  YouTube loses $1.5 million/day which Google says is inconsequential, but *still* &#8212; that&#8217;s a lot of cabbage.  Facebook is notorious for saying they&#8217;re not focused on monetization yet.  So who knows about their long term viability.  THAT SAID, I do believe that engaging in social media is more of a cultural change in organizations vs. learning a particular tool.  So while Twitter may some day go bye-bye (be still my heart), the idea of online networking for customer service, market research, PR, etc. will persist.  It&#8217;ll just be via the newest tool in the toybox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McBride</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Gary, I agree the price of entry for individuals is free, but the risk of any one social network tool going belly up and disappearing, a la the dot com days, is still out there. That&#039;s where I see the similarities. As large as Twitter and Facebook are, they could still turn into a dot com bust 2.0 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I agree the price of entry for individuals is free, but the risk of any one social network tool going belly up and disappearing, a la the dot com days, is still out there. That&#8217;s where I see the similarities. As large as Twitter and Facebook are, they could still turn into a dot com bust 2.0 <img src='http://www.moneysmith.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Moneysmith</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Moneysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Mike: Thanks for the note.  I think the big difference between the dot-com bubble days (daze?)  and today&#039;s social media craze is the cost of entry.  In 1998, you needed to invest hundreds of thousands (if not millions) into custom building some dot-com enterprise.  Today, most social media tools are &quot;free&quot; with the primary investment being time and sweat.  In the &quot;old days&quot; it was all about creating something with the highest projected valuation and flipping it.  Now, it&#039;s about investing time into relationships over the long haul.  While less exciting than then mid 1990&#039;s, I&#039;m a lot more comfortable with the direction things are going today.

Brian: Amen.  But don&#039;t hold your breath ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Thanks for the note.  I think the big difference between the dot-com bubble days (daze?)  and today&#8217;s social media craze is the cost of entry.  In 1998, you needed to invest hundreds of thousands (if not millions) into custom building some dot-com enterprise.  Today, most social media tools are &#8220;free&#8221; with the primary investment being time and sweat.  In the &#8220;old days&#8221; it was all about creating something with the highest projected valuation and flipping it.  Now, it&#8217;s about investing time into relationships over the long haul.  While less exciting than then mid 1990&#8217;s, I&#8217;m a lot more comfortable with the direction things are going today.</p>
<p>Brian: Amen.  But don&#8217;t hold your breath <img src='http://www.moneysmith.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McBride</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I see a lot of the same similarities, especially when it comes to giving employees email/internet access. I also see similarities to the dot com bubble with some of the ROI questions which, of course, wound up with very much the opposite history as the original email/web questions. Social media could still go either way though as time goes on, it&#039;s becoming more and more a part of people&#039;s lives and communication the same way email did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of the same similarities, especially when it comes to giving employees email/internet access. I also see similarities to the dot com bubble with some of the ROI questions which, of course, wound up with very much the opposite history as the original email/web questions. Social media could still go either way though as time goes on, it&#8217;s becoming more and more a part of people&#8217;s lives and communication the same way email did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Link</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/2009/05/5-ways-social-media-reminds-me-of-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmith.com/?p=283#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Dead on, Gary.  All too true.  Now if only the early adopters got to be filthy rich in a new Internet bubble, I&#039;d be OK with it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dead on, Gary.  All too true.  Now if only the early adopters got to be filthy rich in a new Internet bubble, I&#8217;d be OK with it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

