<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words I Use Carefully</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmith.com/words-marketers-have-ruined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmith.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Communications in the Age of New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:18:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/words-marketers-have-ruined/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneysmith.com/?page_id=5#comment-659</guid>
		<description>&quot;Expert&quot;
This is a word used by many with no reasonable way to challenge.  I think the only logical way you can be labeled an expert is if others refer to you in that manner.  Remember what Margaret Thatcher said, &quot;Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren&#039;t.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Expert&#8221;<br />
This is a word used by many with no reasonable way to challenge.  I think the only logical way you can be labeled an expert is if others refer to you in that manner.  Remember what Margaret Thatcher said, &#8220;Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autumn</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmith.com/words-marketers-have-ruined/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneysmith.com/?page_id=5#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hits.

In regards to website statistics, this is so often confused with &quot;unique visitors&quot; or even &quot;page views&quot; that it makes it hard for people to really understand how many people are viewing their content unless they have an in-depth understanding of what all of these terms mean. I think &quot;hits&quot; is too often over-used, as the number of &quot;hits&quot; tend to spiral into daydreams of something dramatic and exciting... when really the numbers often mean something ordinary. Rather I think that hits should be used not as a concrete measurement, but only in relevance to time - as an abstract graph with no numbers attached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hits.</p>
<p>In regards to website statistics, this is so often confused with &#8220;unique visitors&#8221; or even &#8220;page views&#8221; that it makes it hard for people to really understand how many people are viewing their content unless they have an in-depth understanding of what all of these terms mean. I think &#8220;hits&#8221; is too often over-used, as the number of &#8220;hits&#8221; tend to spiral into daydreams of something dramatic and exciting&#8230; when really the numbers often mean something ordinary. Rather I think that hits should be used not as a concrete measurement, but only in relevance to time &#8211; as an abstract graph with no numbers attached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

